How much SaaS spend is sitting in your stack?
Add the tools your sales, marketing, and ops teams pay for. The audit returns total annual spend, spend per employee versus the benchmark for your revenue bracket, a license waste estimate at the Zylo 46% non-utilization rate, overlap detection across 19 categories, and the top consolidation opportunities ranked by potential savings.
Add every SaaS tool your sales, marketing, and operations teams pay for. Per-seat cost goes in monthly. Usage level is your best guess if you don't have utilization data handy.
Add at least one tool above to see your annual SaaS spend, license waste estimate, overlap detection, and consolidation opportunities.
Where the benchmarks come from
Spend and tool-count benchmarks. Zylo's 2026 SaaS Management Index reports that enterprise organizations average 106 apps and $20.6M in annual SaaS spend, with median license utilization at 54%. That means 46% of license spend goes unused. BetterCloud reports the same 106 average and notes 33% of SaaS portfolios were consolidated in 2025.
Sales-team benchmarks. Cleed's 2026 sales-tech roundup: average sales teams use 10 to 15 tools, consolidated leaders target 6, consolidated teams report 43% higher win rates, and 50% of sellers describe their stack as overwhelming.
Consolidation savings. Zylo reports typical savings from consolidating overlap categories of $477K to $2.8M for mid-market and enterprise teams.
Dunamis model assumptions. License waste estimate uses the flat Zylo 46% rate applied to total annual spend, not a per-tool calculation, because the published benchmark is portfolio-level. Overlap savings keep the highest-usage tool in each duplicated category and recover 50% of the cost of the others; consolidation never recovers 100% because the keeper has to absorb migrated workflows. Underutilized = tools marked Rarely or Unknown. Spend-per-employee benchmarks scale down from Zylo's enterprise figure (around $20K per employee at $50M+ revenue) to smaller revenue brackets using industry-typical SaaS-density observations.
We'll send a clean breakdown of your tools, headline spend, license waste, consolidation opportunities, and underutilized tools. Optional. The audit works without it.
Add at least one tool above to enable the report.
Answers to the questions we actually get.
What does the audit return?
Total annual SaaS spend across the tools you list, spend per employee benchmarked against your revenue bracket, a license-waste estimate calculated at the Zylo industry rate of 46% non-utilization, overlap detection that flags multiple tools serving the same of 19 categories (CRM, marketing automation, analytics, dialer, sequencer, and so on), and a ranked list of consolidation opportunities sorted by potential dollars saved. A tool-count benchmark contrasts your stack against published Zylo, BetterCloud, and Cleed industry data.
How granular do the inputs need to be?
One row per SaaS tool. Each row asks for tool name, category, annual cost, and seat count if applicable. You do not need exact contract dates or per-seat pricing tiers; the audit operates on annualized totals. Add as many or as few tools as you want; rough is fine, the goal is the shape of the spend, not a procurement-grade reconciliation.
Where does the 46% non-utilization rate come from?
Zylo's published research on SaaS license utilization. The audit applies the rate uniformly to the seat-based portion of your spend to produce a license-waste estimate. The result page links to the Zylo source so you can see the methodology and adjust the rate down for tools you know are fully utilized.
Do my inputs leave the browser?
No. The audit runs entirely in your browser. Tool names, costs, and seat counts you enter are not posted to a server and are not stored anywhere outside the browser tab. Closing the tab clears the inputs.